Necessary-party requirements limit impleadment of independent entities, while deferred consideration does not create an appealable adverse determinati...
Food supplement classification requires common parlance and authoritative tests, preventing treatment as proprietary Ayurvedic medicines without suppo...
Specified regulatory authority income receives conditional tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income character, and return f...
Tax exemption for regulatory authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-filing...
Input tax credit conditions remain constitutionally valid, with eligible recipient claims considered under GST circulars and retrospective filing dead...
Page of 4790
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
481 to 500 of 95794 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Specific queries, recruitment details, employee-wise particulars, pay slips, compliance explanation and Form 10DA having been called for and placed on record, the assessment was not erroneous for want of enquiry merely because the order lacked elaborate discussion; revision under section 263 was therefore unwarranted. The Principal Commissioner also failed to identify any further enquiry that was specifically necessary. On the deduction issue, amalgamation did not enlarge the assessee's own claim or increase the employees counted for that claim, so the business-reorganisation bar could not be invoked to deny the additional employee cost deduction examined in assessment.
Specific queries, recruitment details, employee-wise particulars, pay slips, compliance explanation and Form 10DA having been called for and placed on record, the assessment was not erroneous for want of enquiry merely because the order lacked elaborate discussion; revision under section 263 was therefore unwarranted. The Principal Commissioner also failed to identify any further enquiry that was specifically necessary. On the deduction issue, amalgamation did not enlarge the assessee's own claim or increase the employees counted for that claim, so the business-reorganisation bar could not be invoked to deny the additional employee cost deduction examined in assessment.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.