<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Adequate enquiry defeats revision, and amalgamation bar did not block the additional employee cost deduction</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101560</link>
    <description>Specific queries, recruitment details, employee-wise particulars, pay slips, compliance explanation and Form 10DA having been called for and placed on record, the assessment was not erroneous for want of enquiry merely because the order lacked elaborate discussion; revision under section 263 was therefore unwarranted. The Principal Commissioner also failed to identify any further enquiry that was specifically necessary. On the deduction issue, amalgamation did not enlarge the assessee&#039;s own claim or increase the employees counted for that claim, so the business-reorganisation bar could not be invoked to deny the additional employee cost deduction examined in assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 07:39:09 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 07:39:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=910968" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Adequate enquiry defeats revision, and amalgamation bar did not block the additional employee cost deduction</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101560</link>
      <description>Specific queries, recruitment details, employee-wise particulars, pay slips, compliance explanation and Form 10DA having been called for and placed on record, the assessment was not erroneous for want of enquiry merely because the order lacked elaborate discussion; revision under section 263 was therefore unwarranted. The Principal Commissioner also failed to identify any further enquiry that was specifically necessary. On the deduction issue, amalgamation did not enlarge the assessee&#039;s own claim or increase the employees counted for that claim, so the business-reorganisation bar could not be invoked to deny the additional employee cost deduction examined in assessment.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 07:39:09 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101560</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>