Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
A continuing personal guarantee remained enforceable despite the guarantor's resignation from the corporate debtor, because the deed expressly made the guarantee continuing, irrevocable and binding on demand. Revocation of a continuing guarantee was treated as operating only for future transactions and requiring notice to the creditor; communications to other consortium members were insufficient. Renewal of credit facilities was held not to amount to novation or a material variance discharging the surety, and liability continued for debt arising under the original loan documents. The challenge based on alleged non-consideration of the guarantor's objections was also rejected.
A continuing personal guarantee remained enforceable despite the guarantor's resignation from the corporate debtor, because the deed expressly made the guarantee continuing, irrevocable and binding on demand. Revocation of a continuing guarantee was treated as operating only for future transactions and requiring notice to the creditor; communications to other consortium members were insufficient. Renewal of credit facilities was held not to amount to novation or a material variance discharging the surety, and liability continued for debt arising under the original loan documents. The challenge based on alleged non-consideration of the guarantor's objections was also rejected.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.