<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Continuing personal guarantee remains enforceable despite resignation, renewal of facilities, claimed novation, or alleged revocation</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101517</link>
    <description>A continuing personal guarantee remained enforceable despite the guarantor&#039;s resignation from the corporate debtor, because the deed expressly made the guarantee continuing, irrevocable and binding on demand. Revocation of a continuing guarantee was treated as operating only for future transactions and requiring notice to the creditor; communications to other consortium members were insufficient. Renewal of credit facilities was held not to amount to novation or a material variance discharging the surety, and liability continued for debt arising under the original loan documents. The challenge based on alleged non-consideration of the guarantor&#039;s objections was also rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 08:35:36 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 08:35:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=910799" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Continuing personal guarantee remains enforceable despite resignation, renewal of facilities, claimed novation, or alleged revocation</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101517</link>
      <description>A continuing personal guarantee remained enforceable despite the guarantor&#039;s resignation from the corporate debtor, because the deed expressly made the guarantee continuing, irrevocable and binding on demand. Revocation of a continuing guarantee was treated as operating only for future transactions and requiring notice to the creditor; communications to other consortium members were insufficient. Renewal of credit facilities was held not to amount to novation or a material variance discharging the surety, and liability continued for debt arising under the original loan documents. The challenge based on alleged non-consideration of the guarantor&#039;s objections was also rejected.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 08:35:36 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101517</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>