Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Page of 4786
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
861 to 880 of 95714 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
In completed or unabated assessments under section 153A, additions are confined to incriminating material found during the search; material already available with the Revenue, such as the HSBC Geneva Base Note, cannot by itself support an addition. Applying that rule, the article notes that the additions for the relevant year were unsustainable because no incriminating search material linked to them was found. On section 69A, the threshold requirement is proof that the assessee owned the money or asset; where the foreign accounts stood in third-party names and the Revenue could not prove ownership, the additions were properly deleted.
In completed or unabated assessments under section 153A, additions are confined to incriminating material found during the search; material already available with the Revenue, such as the HSBC Geneva Base Note, cannot by itself support an addition. Applying that rule, the article notes that the additions for the relevant year were unsustainable because no incriminating search material linked to them was found. On section 69A, the threshold requirement is proof that the assessee owned the money or asset; where the foreign accounts stood in third-party names and the Revenue could not prove ownership, the additions were properly deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.