Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Assessment against deceased sole proprietor requires proceedings against the legal representative, rendering prior assessment and appellate orders inv...
Residential waste collection classification under SAC 999423 defeats composite-supply exemption where facilitating goods are not transferred to the lo...
Condonation of delay permits statutory appeal restoration where inadequate service explanation prevented consideration of reassessment and taxable-inc...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 95875 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
In completed or unabated assessments under section 153A, additions are confined to incriminating material found during the search; material already available with the Revenue, such as the HSBC Geneva Base Note, cannot by itself support an addition. Applying that rule, the article notes that the additions for the relevant year were unsustainable because no incriminating search material linked to them was found. On section 69A, the threshold requirement is proof that the assessee owned the money or asset; where the foreign accounts stood in third-party names and the Revenue could not prove ownership, the additions were properly deleted.
In completed or unabated assessments under section 153A, additions are confined to incriminating material found during the search; material already available with the Revenue, such as the HSBC Geneva Base Note, cannot by itself support an addition. Applying that rule, the article notes that the additions for the relevant year were unsustainable because no incriminating search material linked to them was found. On section 69A, the threshold requirement is proof that the assessee owned the money or asset; where the foreign accounts stood in third-party names and the Revenue could not prove ownership, the additions were properly deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.