Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
In completed or unabated assessments under section 153A, additions are confined to incriminating material found during the search; material already available with the Revenue, such as the HSBC Geneva Base Note, cannot by itself support an addition. Applying that rule, the article notes that the additions for the relevant year were unsustainable because no incriminating search material linked to them was found. On section 69A, the threshold requirement is proof that the assessee owned the money or asset; where the foreign accounts stood in third-party names and the Revenue could not prove ownership, the additions were properly deleted.
In completed or unabated assessments under section 153A, additions are confined to incriminating material found during the search; material already available with the Revenue, such as the HSBC Geneva Base Note, cannot by itself support an addition. Applying that rule, the article notes that the additions for the relevant year were unsustainable because no incriminating search material linked to them was found. On section 69A, the threshold requirement is proof that the assessee owned the money or asset; where the foreign accounts stood in third-party names and the Revenue could not prove ownership, the additions were properly deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.