Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
In completed or unabated assessments under section 153A, additions are confined to incriminating material found during the search; material already available with the Revenue, such as the HSBC Geneva Base Note, cannot by itself support an addition. Applying that rule, the article notes that the additions for the relevant year were unsustainable because no incriminating search material linked to them was found. On section 69A, the threshold requirement is proof that the assessee owned the money or asset; where the foreign accounts stood in third-party names and the Revenue could not prove ownership, the additions were properly deleted.
In completed or unabated assessments under section 153A, additions are confined to incriminating material found during the search; material already available with the Revenue, such as the HSBC Geneva Base Note, cannot by itself support an addition. Applying that rule, the article notes that the additions for the relevant year were unsustainable because no incriminating search material linked to them was found. On section 69A, the threshold requirement is proof that the assessee owned the money or asset; where the foreign accounts stood in third-party names and the Revenue could not prove ownership, the additions were properly deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.