Clean slate principle extinguishes uncrystallised operational claims and bars continuation of pending recovery and arbitral proceedings after plan app...
Works contract classification governs composite layout-development contracts where VAT-paid goods are transferred alongside construction and infrastru...
Page of 4788
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
761 to 780 of 95749 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
A State statutory first charge under tax enactments was held to prevail over the priority claimed by a secured creditor under Section 26E of the SARFAESI Act, because Section 26E operates prospectively and does not itself create a first charge. The text also notes that prospective operation may still take account of antecedent events, but that does not alter the result where the superior court has already limited Section 26E to prospective effect. For CST dues, State recovery powers were treated as incorporated through section 9(2), allowing the Commercial Tax Department to rely on the State first charge. An earlier order permitting sale outside liquidation was recalled for want of hearing the Department.
A State statutory first charge under tax enactments was held to prevail over the priority claimed by a secured creditor under Section 26E of the SARFAESI Act, because Section 26E operates prospectively and does not itself create a first charge. The text also notes that prospective operation may still take account of antecedent events, but that does not alter the result where the superior court has already limited Section 26E to prospective effect. For CST dues, State recovery powers were treated as incorporated through section 9(2), allowing the Commercial Tax Department to rely on the State first charge. An earlier order permitting sale outside liquidation was recalled for want of hearing the Department.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.