Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2701 to 2720 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Partial denial of exemption for benefit to specified persons was confined to the income said to have been diverted; the broader exemption under sections 11 and 12 was not forfeited in full, and the 15 per cent amount treated as deemed application under section 11 was deleted. A payment to a related concern was not hit by the specified concern rule because the trustee's voting power was below the 20 per cent threshold, and a procedural error in Form 10B did not defeat the exemption claim. Capital expenditure was also allowed as application of income on an accrual basis, with supporting invoices, disclosure in the balance sheet, and replies to notices sufficient on the facts.
Partial denial of exemption for benefit to specified persons was confined to the income said to have been diverted; the broader exemption under sections 11 and 12 was not forfeited in full, and the 15 per cent amount treated as deemed application under section 11 was deleted. A payment to a related concern was not hit by the specified concern rule because the trustee's voting power was below the 20 per cent threshold, and a procedural error in Form 10B did not defeat the exemption claim. Capital expenditure was also allowed as application of income on an accrual basis, with supporting invoices, disclosure in the balance sheet, and replies to notices sufficient on the facts.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
