Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
Draft assessment repeated in the final order without incorporating DRP directions was held invalid, because directions under section 144C bind the Assessing Officer and the final assessment must conform to them. The Tribunal, following Olympus Medical Systems (P) Ltd., treated non-conformity with the DRP procedure as rendering the final assessment order bad in law and liable to be quashed. On that basis, the impugned order was quashed as null and void, and the remaining jurisdictional and merits grounds were left unadjudicated.
Draft assessment repeated in the final order without incorporating DRP directions was held invalid, because directions under section 144C bind the Assessing Officer and the final assessment must conform to them. The Tribunal, following Olympus Medical Systems (P) Ltd., treated non-conformity with the DRP procedure as rendering the final assessment order bad in law and liable to be quashed. On that basis, the impugned order was quashed as null and void, and the remaining jurisdictional and merits grounds were left unadjudicated.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
