Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the final assessment order was liable to be quashed for not being passed in conformity with the Dispute Resolution Panel directions under section 144C of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The final assessment order was found to be verbatim identical to the draft assessment order and did not refer to or give effect to the binding directions issued by the Dispute Resolution Panel. Sections 144C(5), 144C(10) and 144C(13) require the Assessing Officer to pass the final order in conformity with those directions. Non-compliance with that mandatory scheme rendered the assessment unsustainable in law.
Conclusion: The final assessment order was quashed and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: An assessment order passed under section 144C is invalid if it is not framed in conformity with the binding directions of the Dispute Resolution Panel and merely reproduces the draft order without giving effect to those directions.