Objective characteristics and principal use govern mining-tyre classification, while fresh advance ruling applications may rely on additional technica...
Administrative fraud classification suspension does not halt independent criminal investigation or warrant-based searches into alleged economic offenc...
For AY 2015-16, reassessment notices issued after expiry of the earlier six-year limitation could not be revived under the amended regime. The exclusion and extension in the fifth and sixth provisos were confined to computing limitation under the amended provision and did not dilute the absolute bar created by the first proviso where the notice had already become time-barred. A notice issued on 07/04/2022 was therefore beyond the surviving limitation and without jurisdiction, and the consequential reassessment was quashed.
For AY 2015-16, reassessment notices issued after expiry of the earlier six-year limitation could not be revived under the amended regime. The exclusion and extension in the fifth and sixth provisos were confined to computing limitation under the amended provision and did not dilute the absolute bar created by the first proviso where the notice had already become time-barred. A notice issued on 07/04/2022 was therefore beyond the surviving limitation and without jurisdiction, and the consequential reassessment was quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.