Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the notice issued under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the relevant assessment year was barred by limitation under the amended section 149(1), and whether the consequential assessment order could survive.
Analysis: The notice under section 148 was issued after the expiry of the limitation period that existed under clause (b) of section 149(1) as it stood before the Finance Act, 2021. The first proviso to the amended section 149(1) prohibits issuance of a reopening notice for a year beginning on or before 1 April 2021 where such notice could not have been issued earlier under the unamended limitation regime. The exclusion period and seven-day extension contained in the fifth and sixth provisos do not revive a notice that is otherwise hit by the restriction in the first proviso. Once the notice itself is invalid, the assessment made pursuant to it cannot stand.
Conclusion: The reassessment notice was time-barred and invalid, and the consequential assessment order was quashed.
Ratio Decidendi: A reassessment notice for an assessment year falling within the pre-1 April 2021 regime cannot be sustained if it was already time-barred under the unamended section 149(1)(b), and the fifth and sixth provisos to the amended section 149(1) cannot extend the restriction imposed by the first proviso.