Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
321 to 340 of 95875 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
For AY 2015-16, reassessment notices issued after expiry of the earlier six-year limitation could not be revived under the amended regime. The exclusion and extension in the fifth and sixth provisos were confined to computing limitation under the amended provision and did not dilute the absolute bar created by the first proviso where the notice had already become time-barred. A notice issued on 07/04/2022 was therefore beyond the surviving limitation and without jurisdiction, and the consequential reassessment was quashed.
For AY 2015-16, reassessment notices issued after expiry of the earlier six-year limitation could not be revived under the amended regime. The exclusion and extension in the fifth and sixth provisos were confined to computing limitation under the amended provision and did not dilute the absolute bar created by the first proviso where the notice had already become time-barred. A notice issued on 07/04/2022 was therefore beyond the surviving limitation and without jurisdiction, and the consequential reassessment was quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
