Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
For AY 2015-16, reassessment notices issued after expiry of the earlier six-year limitation could not be revived under the amended regime. The exclusion and extension in the fifth and sixth provisos were confined to computing limitation under the amended provision and did not dilute the absolute bar created by the first proviso where the notice had already become time-barred. A notice issued on 07/04/2022 was therefore beyond the surviving limitation and without jurisdiction, and the consequential reassessment was quashed.
For AY 2015-16, reassessment notices issued after expiry of the earlier six-year limitation could not be revived under the amended regime. The exclusion and extension in the fifth and sixth provisos were confined to computing limitation under the amended provision and did not dilute the absolute bar created by the first proviso where the notice had already become time-barred. A notice issued on 07/04/2022 was therefore beyond the surviving limitation and without jurisdiction, and the consequential reassessment was quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.