Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
Ad hoc confirmation of one-fifth of an alleged unexplained investment in a flat was found arbitrary where the source of payments was supported by bank transfers, housing finance, accumulated savings from government service, family agricultural income, and the spouse's income; that addition was deleted. The separate addition for the difference between stamp duty value and purchase price was also deleted because the order gave no cogent reason for refusing a valuation reference, relied on the wrong charging provision for the relevant assessment year, and ignored evidence showing demolition action for unauthorised construction, which supported the declared price as the flat's fair market value.
Ad hoc confirmation of one-fifth of an alleged unexplained investment in a flat was found arbitrary where the source of payments was supported by bank transfers, housing finance, accumulated savings from government service, family agricultural income, and the spouse's income; that addition was deleted. The separate addition for the difference between stamp duty value and purchase price was also deleted because the order gave no cogent reason for refusing a valuation reference, relied on the wrong charging provision for the relevant assessment year, and ignored evidence showing demolition action for unauthorised construction, which supported the declared price as the flat's fair market value.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.