<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Unexplained investment and stamp duty differential additions deleted after bank trail and valuation evidence supported flat purchase price</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101453</link>
    <description>Ad hoc confirmation of one-fifth of an alleged unexplained investment in a flat was found arbitrary where the source of payments was supported by bank transfers, housing finance, accumulated savings from government service, family agricultural income, and the spouse&#039;s income; that addition was deleted. The separate addition for the difference between stamp duty value and purchase price was also deleted because the order gave no cogent reason for refusing a valuation reference, relied on the wrong charging provision for the relevant assessment year, and ignored evidence showing demolition action for unauthorised construction, which supported the declared price as the flat&#039;s fair market value.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 08:39:43 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 08:39:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=910406" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Unexplained investment and stamp duty differential additions deleted after bank trail and valuation evidence supported flat purchase price</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101453</link>
      <description>Ad hoc confirmation of one-fifth of an alleged unexplained investment in a flat was found arbitrary where the source of payments was supported by bank transfers, housing finance, accumulated savings from government service, family agricultural income, and the spouse&#039;s income; that addition was deleted. The separate addition for the difference between stamp duty value and purchase price was also deleted because the order gave no cogent reason for refusing a valuation reference, relied on the wrong charging provision for the relevant assessment year, and ignored evidence showing demolition action for unauthorised construction, which supported the declared price as the flat&#039;s fair market value.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 08:39:43 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101453</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>