Authentication of paper assessment orders upheld, while qualifying repairs, consumables and vendor advance write-offs remain deductible business claim...
Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Necessary-party requirements limit impleadment of independent entities, while deferred consideration does not create an appealable adverse determinati...
Page of 4793
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
521 to 540 of 95847 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Ad hoc confirmation of one-fifth of an alleged unexplained investment in a flat was found arbitrary where the source of payments was supported by bank transfers, housing finance, accumulated savings from government service, family agricultural income, and the spouse's income; that addition was deleted. The separate addition for the difference between stamp duty value and purchase price was also deleted because the order gave no cogent reason for refusing a valuation reference, relied on the wrong charging provision for the relevant assessment year, and ignored evidence showing demolition action for unauthorised construction, which supported the declared price as the flat's fair market value.
Ad hoc confirmation of one-fifth of an alleged unexplained investment in a flat was found arbitrary where the source of payments was supported by bank transfers, housing finance, accumulated savings from government service, family agricultural income, and the spouse's income; that addition was deleted. The separate addition for the difference between stamp duty value and purchase price was also deleted because the order gave no cogent reason for refusing a valuation reference, relied on the wrong charging provision for the relevant assessment year, and ignored evidence showing demolition action for unauthorised construction, which supported the declared price as the flat's fair market value.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4793
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
