Timing mismatch in income recognition requires verification whether receipts were already taxed in an earlier year; matter remitted for fresh examinat...
FOB transaction value and export incentives: customs valuation cannot override contractual export benefits or support confiscation without valid proof...
Page of 4824
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
4781 to 4800 of 96463 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Penalty under Sections 112(a) and 112(b) could not be sustained because the show-cause notice did not propose those penalties; the Tribunal set them aside for want of notice. Section 114AA was held to cover any knowing or intentional use of a false or incorrect declaration, statement or document in transactions under the Act, including import matters; the Tribunal therefore confirmed the penalty under that provision.
Penalty under Sections 112(a) and 112(b) could not be sustained because the show-cause notice did not propose those penalties; the Tribunal set them aside for want of notice. Section 114AA was held to cover any knowing or intentional use of a false or incorrect declaration, statement or document in transactions under the Act, including import matters; the Tribunal therefore confirmed the penalty under that provision.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.