Customs penalty scope and false declaration rules: penalties beyond the show-cause notice fail, while Section 114AA was sustained.

Penalties under Sections 112(a) and 112(b) of the Customs Act could not be sustained because they were not proposed in the show-cause notice; an adjudication order cannot travel beyond the notice, so those penalties were set aside. Penalty under Section 114AA was upheld because the provision applies where a person knowingly or intentionally makes, signs, uses, or causes to be made, signed or used, a false or incorrect declaration, statement, or document in the course of business for the purposes of the Act, and that test was satisfied on the facts.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether penalties under Sections 112(a) and 112(b) of the Customs Act, 1962 could be sustained when they were not proposed in the show-cause notice; (ii) Whether penalty under Section 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 was sustainable in the facts of the case.

Issue (i): Whether penalties under Sections 112(a) and 112(b) of the Customs Act, 1962 could be sustained when they were not proposed in the show-cause notice.

Analysis: The show-cause notice did not propose imposition of penalties under Sections 112(a) and 112(b). A penalty order travelling beyond the scope of the notice cannot be sustained.

Conclusion: The penalties imposed under Sections 112(a) and 112(b) of the Customs Act, 1962 were set aside.

Issue (ii): Whether penalty under Section 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 was sustainable in the facts of the case.

Analysis: Section 114AA applies where a person knowingly or intentionally makes, signs, uses, or causes to be made, signed or used, a false or incorrect declaration, statement, or document in the transaction of business for the purposes of the Act. On that construction, the provision was held applicable on the facts, and the contrary view taken in the cited revisionary order was not accepted.

Conclusion: The penalty under Section 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 was upheld.

Final Conclusion: The appeals succeeded only to the extent of deleting the penalties under Sections 112(a) and 112(b), while the penalty under Section 114AA remained confirmed.

Ratio Decidendi: A customs penalty cannot be sustained when it is not proposed in the show-cause notice, but Section 114AA is attracted where a person knowingly or intentionally uses a false or incorrect declaration, statement, or document in the course of business for the purposes of the Act.

---