Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Page of 4796
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
301 to 320 of 95916 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Conditional provisional release of seized imported multifunctional devices was directed on safeguards including payment of the enhanced duty as quantified, furnishing of a bank guarantee, and maintenance of transaction details if the goods were onward sold. The note records that the matter was treated on the same footing as an earlier seizure case, and that interim release would not affect the statutory customs adjudication. The adjudicating authority was required to decide the dispute independently, after hearing the importer and without being influenced by the release order.
Conditional provisional release of seized imported multifunctional devices was directed on safeguards including payment of the enhanced duty as quantified, furnishing of a bank guarantee, and maintenance of transaction details if the goods were onward sold. The note records that the matter was treated on the same footing as an earlier seizure case, and that interim release would not affect the statutory customs adjudication. The adjudicating authority was required to decide the dispute independently, after hearing the importer and without being influenced by the release order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.