Provisional release of seized imported goods allowed on conditions, while customs adjudication remained independent.

Seized imported goods were directed to be provisionally released subject to conditions, including payment of enhanced duty, Customs quantification within a fixed time, furnishing of bank guarantee, and preservation of transaction details if the goods were sold. The conditional release was limited to interim relief and did not affect the separate customs adjudication. The adjudicating authority was permitted to proceed independently, consider both sides' objections on their own merits, and decide the matter uninfluenced by the release order.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the seized imported goods were liable to be provisionally released on conditions; (ii) Whether the adjudicating authority could proceed independently and decide the matter uninfluenced by the conditional release order.

Issue (i): Whether the seized imported goods were liable to be provisionally released on conditions.

Analysis: The writ petition concerned only a seizure memo and a request for interim release of the imported consignment. The Court followed its earlier approach in similar matters and directed provisional release of the goods on fulfilment of stipulated conditions, including payment of the enhanced duty, quantification by Customs within a fixed time, furnishing of a bank guarantee, and maintenance of transaction details if the goods were subsequently sold.

Conclusion: The goods were directed to be released provisionally subject to the specified conditions, in favour of the assessee.

Issue (ii): Whether the adjudicating authority could proceed independently and decide the matter uninfluenced by the conditional release order.

Analysis: The Court expressly preserved the adjudicatory function of the Customs authority and clarified that the conditional release order would not inhibit further proceedings. It also stated that the petitioner would be entitled to participate in the adjudication and that the authority must decide the objections and contentions of both sides on their own merits.

Conclusion: The adjudicating authority was permitted to proceed in accordance with law, uninfluenced by the provisional release order.

Final Conclusion: The writ petition succeeded with conditional provisional release of the seized goods, while leaving the merits of the customs adjudication open for independent determination.

---