Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Page of 4796
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
301 to 320 of 95918 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Related party status, guarantee claim limits and security-interest restrictions determined the treatment of the appellant's CIRP claim. The tribunal found related party status on the basis of step-down subsidiary control, and treated prior BIFR status as irrelevant. It upheld rejection of the HSBC-related secured claim because the payer/guarantor had no assignable debt. A non-resident could not acquire security in the corporate debtor's immovable property without RBI permission under FERA, so secured-creditor status was denied for that asset class. The admitted guarantee claim was confined to the amount actually paid, and post-facto RBI approval could not enlarge it. Approval of the resolution plan and CoC distribution mechanism was sustained.
Related party status, guarantee claim limits and security-interest restrictions determined the treatment of the appellant's CIRP claim. The tribunal found related party status on the basis of step-down subsidiary control, and treated prior BIFR status as irrelevant. It upheld rejection of the HSBC-related secured claim because the payer/guarantor had no assignable debt. A non-resident could not acquire security in the corporate debtor's immovable property without RBI permission under FERA, so secured-creditor status was denied for that asset class. The admitted guarantee claim was confined to the amount actually paid, and post-facto RBI approval could not enlarge it. Approval of the resolution plan and CoC distribution mechanism was sustained.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
