Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Provident fund, gratuity and pension dues were treated as statutory employee entitlements excluded from the liquidation estate, and the Tribunal rejected the argument that a segregated fund must exist on the liquidation commencement date for those dues to survive. It held that the provision is due-centric, not asset-centric, so the liquidator remains liable to pay such amounts outside distribution under the waterfall. The Tribunal also allowed exclusion of 1656 days of litigation time when computing twenty-four months' workmen dues, so prolonged CIRP delay would not defeat workmen's priority. A recovery certificate for salary dues was held to remain part of workmen's claims under the liquidation process.
Provident fund, gratuity and pension dues were treated as statutory employee entitlements excluded from the liquidation estate, and the Tribunal rejected the argument that a segregated fund must exist on the liquidation commencement date for those dues to survive. It held that the provision is due-centric, not asset-centric, so the liquidator remains liable to pay such amounts outside distribution under the waterfall. The Tribunal also allowed exclusion of 1656 days of litigation time when computing twenty-four months' workmen dues, so prolonged CIRP delay would not defeat workmen's priority. A recovery certificate for salary dues was held to remain part of workmen's claims under the liquidation process.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.