<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Provident fund and gratuity dues remain outside liquidation estate despite no segregated fund at commencement</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101366</link>
    <description>Provident fund, gratuity and pension dues were treated as statutory employee entitlements excluded from the liquidation estate, and the Tribunal rejected the argument that a segregated fund must exist on the liquidation commencement date for those dues to survive. It held that the provision is due-centric, not asset-centric, so the liquidator remains liable to pay such amounts outside distribution under the waterfall. The Tribunal also allowed exclusion of 1656 days of litigation time when computing twenty-four months&#039; workmen dues, so prolonged CIRP delay would not defeat workmen&#039;s priority. A recovery certificate for salary dues was held to remain part of workmen&#039;s claims under the liquidation process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2026 08:15:43 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2026 08:15:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=909945" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Provident fund and gratuity dues remain outside liquidation estate despite no segregated fund at commencement</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101366</link>
      <description>Provident fund, gratuity and pension dues were treated as statutory employee entitlements excluded from the liquidation estate, and the Tribunal rejected the argument that a segregated fund must exist on the liquidation commencement date for those dues to survive. It held that the provision is due-centric, not asset-centric, so the liquidator remains liable to pay such amounts outside distribution under the waterfall. The Tribunal also allowed exclusion of 1656 days of litigation time when computing twenty-four months&#039; workmen dues, so prolonged CIRP delay would not defeat workmen&#039;s priority. A recovery certificate for salary dues was held to remain part of workmen&#039;s claims under the liquidation process.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2026 08:15:43 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101366</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>