Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Properties acquired before the scheduled offence could still be attached as value of proceeds of crime where tainted funds were used to repay loans or the direct proceeds were unavailable; disclosure of the assets in income-tax records did not alter the alleged tainted character of the funds. The Tribunal also held that statements recorded under Section 50 of PMLA are admissible in proceedings under the Act and may be relied on even if later disputed, where supporting material exists. However, provisional attachment of a security deposit already in Judicial Magistrate custody failed because reasons to believe under Section 5(1) must include a real apprehension of concealment, transfer, or frustration of confiscation; that attachment was set aside.
Properties acquired before the scheduled offence could still be attached as value of proceeds of crime where tainted funds were used to repay loans or the direct proceeds were unavailable; disclosure of the assets in income-tax records did not alter the alleged tainted character of the funds. The Tribunal also held that statements recorded under Section 50 of PMLA are admissible in proceedings under the Act and may be relied on even if later disputed, where supporting material exists. However, provisional attachment of a security deposit already in Judicial Magistrate custody failed because reasons to believe under Section 5(1) must include a real apprehension of concealment, transfer, or frustration of confiscation; that attachment was set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
