Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
Properties acquired before the scheduled offence could still be attached as value of proceeds of crime where tainted funds were used to repay loans or the direct proceeds were unavailable; disclosure of the assets in income-tax records did not alter the alleged tainted character of the funds. The Tribunal also held that statements recorded under Section 50 of PMLA are admissible in proceedings under the Act and may be relied on even if later disputed, where supporting material exists. However, provisional attachment of a security deposit already in Judicial Magistrate custody failed because reasons to believe under Section 5(1) must include a real apprehension of concealment, transfer, or frustration of confiscation; that attachment was set aside.
Properties acquired before the scheduled offence could still be attached as value of proceeds of crime where tainted funds were used to repay loans or the direct proceeds were unavailable; disclosure of the assets in income-tax records did not alter the alleged tainted character of the funds. The Tribunal also held that statements recorded under Section 50 of PMLA are admissible in proceedings under the Act and may be relied on even if later disputed, where supporting material exists. However, provisional attachment of a security deposit already in Judicial Magistrate custody failed because reasons to believe under Section 5(1) must include a real apprehension of concealment, transfer, or frustration of confiscation; that attachment was set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
