Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Necessary-party requirements limit impleadment of independent entities, while deferred consideration does not create an appealable adverse determinati...
Food supplement classification requires common parlance and authoritative tests, preventing treatment as proprietary Ayurvedic medicines without suppo...
Specified regulatory authority income receives conditional tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income character, and return f...
Tax exemption for regulatory authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-filing...
Page of 4796
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
601 to 620 of 95918 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
For enforcement of a foreign arbitral award, Article 137 applies and limitation runs from accrual of the right to apply, which may arise on communication of the signed award rather than invariably on the award date; on the facts stated, the petition was timely because the award was communicated later. The public policy objection failed because refusal of enforcement is confined narrowly to Section 48 grounds, and the transaction was treated as a commercial arrangement rather than a factoring transaction requiring registration. Joint and several liability under the award meant pursuit of one debtor did not bar action against another absent clear waiver or novation; the forbearance agreement did not extinguish liability.
For enforcement of a foreign arbitral award, Article 137 applies and limitation runs from accrual of the right to apply, which may arise on communication of the signed award rather than invariably on the award date; on the facts stated, the petition was timely because the award was communicated later. The public policy objection failed because refusal of enforcement is confined narrowly to Section 48 grounds, and the transaction was treated as a commercial arrangement rather than a factoring transaction requiring registration. Joint and several liability under the award meant pursuit of one debtor did not bar action against another absent clear waiver or novation; the forbearance agreement did not extinguish liability.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
