Transfer pricing and tax deductions upheld on established principles, while employee contributions and warranty provisions returned for fresh examinat...
Captive transfer pricing relies on industrial consumer tariffs, while genuine quotations can benchmark effluent treatment transfers under the Other Me...
Specific tariff classification for ophthalmic instruments and extended limitation principles determine the treatment of duty demands, confiscation, an...
Integrated golf function determines classification, placing launch monitors and simulators under other golf equipment rather than measuring instrument...
Public servant status under anti-corruption law extends to recognised stock exchange leadership; constitutional and sanction challenges do not succeed...
Acquiescence, homebuyer protection and clean-slate resolution principles prevent landowners from disrupting an integrated project through late termina...
Payments to non-residents for travel-agent and hotel-booking commissions did not attract TDS on the facts found, because the assessee had furnished Form 15CB for each transaction, deducted and deposited tax wherever applicable, and filed the TDS returns. The HC accepted the Tribunal's finding that the commission payments to banks, credit card companies, travel agents and related service providers were not sums liable for deduction under section 195 in those circumstances. Since the assessee had complied with the TDS requirements and there was no adverse reporting in Form 3CD on non-deduction, it could not be treated as an assessee in default under section 201, and the deletion of section 201(1) and 201(1A) action was upheld.
Payments to non-residents for travel-agent and hotel-booking commissions did not attract TDS on the facts found, because the assessee had furnished Form 15CB for each transaction, deducted and deposited tax wherever applicable, and filed the TDS returns. The HC accepted the Tribunal's finding that the commission payments to banks, credit card companies, travel agents and related service providers were not sums liable for deduction under section 195 in those circumstances. Since the assessee had complied with the TDS requirements and there was no adverse reporting in Form 3CD on non-deduction, it could not be treated as an assessee in default under section 201, and the deletion of section 201(1) and 201(1A) action was upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.