Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
Imported nickel-chromium wire could not be reclassified where the dispute was already covered by the co-ordinate Bench decision in the appellant's own case. The Tribunal noted that the earlier ruling had examined the same goods with reference to the mill test certificate, chapter notes and sub-heading notes, and had rejected the Department's classification. As no factual distinction or change in law was shown, the reclassification was unsustainable. The impugned order was set aside, the appeal was allowed, and consequential benefits followed as per law.
Imported nickel-chromium wire could not be reclassified where the dispute was already covered by the co-ordinate Bench decision in the appellant's own case. The Tribunal noted that the earlier ruling had examined the same goods with reference to the mill test certificate, chapter notes and sub-heading notes, and had rejected the Department's classification. As no factual distinction or change in law was shown, the reclassification was unsustainable. The impugned order was set aside, the appeal was allowed, and consequential benefits followed as per law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.