<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Imported nickel-chromium wire classification: prior co-ordinate bench ruling barred reclassification absent factual change or legal change.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101338</link>
    <description>Imported nickel-chromium wire could not be reclassified where the dispute was already covered by the co-ordinate Bench decision in the appellant&#039;s own case. The Tribunal noted that the earlier ruling had examined the same goods with reference to the mill test certificate, chapter notes and sub-heading notes, and had rejected the Department&#039;s classification. As no factual distinction or change in law was shown, the reclassification was unsustainable. The impugned order was set aside, the appeal was allowed, and consequential benefits followed as per law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 08:49:55 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 08:49:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=909763" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Imported nickel-chromium wire classification: prior co-ordinate bench ruling barred reclassification absent factual change or legal change.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101338</link>
      <description>Imported nickel-chromium wire could not be reclassified where the dispute was already covered by the co-ordinate Bench decision in the appellant&#039;s own case. The Tribunal noted that the earlier ruling had examined the same goods with reference to the mill test certificate, chapter notes and sub-heading notes, and had rejected the Department&#039;s classification. As no factual distinction or change in law was shown, the reclassification was unsustainable. The impugned order was set aside, the appeal was allowed, and consequential benefits followed as per law.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 08:49:55 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101338</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>