Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
701 to 720 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Deduction under section 54F was held allowable despite non-deposit of the unutilized capital gains in the Capital Gains Account Scheme before the return due date, because the assessee had actually invested the amount in purchase or construction of a residential house within the time permitted under section 54F(1). The Tribunal held that section 54F(4) applies where the assessee seeks to retain the unutilized amount while claiming exemption; it does not by itself defeat relief when the investment condition is otherwise satisfied. The disallowance was reversed and the Assessing Officer was directed to allow the deduction.
Deduction under section 54F was held allowable despite non-deposit of the unutilized capital gains in the Capital Gains Account Scheme before the return due date, because the assessee had actually invested the amount in purchase or construction of a residential house within the time permitted under section 54F(1). The Tribunal held that section 54F(4) applies where the assessee seeks to retain the unutilized amount while claiming exemption; it does not by itself defeat relief when the investment condition is otherwise satisfied. The disallowance was reversed and the Assessing Officer was directed to allow the deduction.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.