Authentication of paper assessment orders upheld, while qualifying repairs, consumables and vendor advance write-offs remain deductible business claim...
Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Deduction under section 54F was held allowable despite non-deposit of the unutilized capital gains in the Capital Gains Account Scheme before the return due date, because the assessee had actually invested the amount in purchase or construction of a residential house within the time permitted under section 54F(1). The Tribunal held that section 54F(4) applies where the assessee seeks to retain the unutilized amount while claiming exemption; it does not by itself defeat relief when the investment condition is otherwise satisfied. The disallowance was reversed and the Assessing Officer was directed to allow the deduction.
Deduction under section 54F was held allowable despite non-deposit of the unutilized capital gains in the Capital Gains Account Scheme before the return due date, because the assessee had actually invested the amount in purchase or construction of a residential house within the time permitted under section 54F(1). The Tribunal held that section 54F(4) applies where the assessee seeks to retain the unutilized amount while claiming exemption; it does not by itself defeat relief when the investment condition is otherwise satisfied. The disallowance was reversed and the Assessing Officer was directed to allow the deduction.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
