Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
401 to 420 of 95875 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Deduction under section 54F was held allowable despite non-deposit of the unutilized capital gains in the Capital Gains Account Scheme before the return due date, because the assessee had actually invested the amount in purchase or construction of a residential house within the time permitted under section 54F(1). The Tribunal held that section 54F(4) applies where the assessee seeks to retain the unutilized amount while claiming exemption; it does not by itself defeat relief when the investment condition is otherwise satisfied. The disallowance was reversed and the Assessing Officer was directed to allow the deduction.
Deduction under section 54F was held allowable despite non-deposit of the unutilized capital gains in the Capital Gains Account Scheme before the return due date, because the assessee had actually invested the amount in purchase or construction of a residential house within the time permitted under section 54F(1). The Tribunal held that section 54F(4) applies where the assessee seeks to retain the unutilized amount while claiming exemption; it does not by itself defeat relief when the investment condition is otherwise satisfied. The disallowance was reversed and the Assessing Officer was directed to allow the deduction.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
