Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Necessary-party requirements limit impleadment of independent entities, while deferred consideration does not create an appealable adverse determinati...
Food supplement classification requires common parlance and authoritative tests, preventing treatment as proprietary Ayurvedic medicines without suppo...
Specified regulatory authority income receives conditional tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income character, and return f...
Tax exemption for regulatory authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-filing...
Page of 4796
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
601 to 620 of 95918 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Payments for onsite software development services routed through a US branch were treated as fees for technical services under domestic law, but treaty relief under the India-US DTAA applied because the make available condition was not satisfied, so no tax was deductible and the section 40(a)(i) disallowance failed. Licensed access to website content carrying the foreign supplier's branding was characterised as royalty, so the non-deduction of tax attracted disallowance. The section 14A/Rule 8D addition was deleted for lack of objective satisfaction, CSR donations remained eligible for deduction under section 80G subject to verification, and the Tangent International issue was remanded for examination of the scope of work.
Payments for onsite software development services routed through a US branch were treated as fees for technical services under domestic law, but treaty relief under the India-US DTAA applied because the make available condition was not satisfied, so no tax was deductible and the section 40(a)(i) disallowance failed. Licensed access to website content carrying the foreign supplier's branding was characterised as royalty, so the non-deduction of tax attracted disallowance. The section 14A/Rule 8D addition was deleted for lack of objective satisfaction, CSR donations remained eligible for deduction under section 80G subject to verification, and the Tangent International issue was remanded for examination of the scope of work.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.