<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Make available test under India-US DTAA defeated taxability of US branch software payments, while royalty and 14A issues differed</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101303</link>
    <description>Payments for onsite software development services routed through a US branch were treated as fees for technical services under domestic law, but treaty relief under the India-US DTAA applied because the make available condition was not satisfied, so no tax was deductible and the section 40(a)(i) disallowance failed. Licensed access to website content carrying the foreign supplier&#039;s branding was characterised as royalty, so the non-deduction of tax attracted disallowance. The section 14A/Rule 8D addition was deleted for lack of objective satisfaction, CSR donations remained eligible for deduction under section 80G subject to verification, and the Tangent International issue was remanded for examination of the scope of work.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 08:07:08 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 08:07:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=909500" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Make available test under India-US DTAA defeated taxability of US branch software payments, while royalty and 14A issues differed</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101303</link>
      <description>Payments for onsite software development services routed through a US branch were treated as fees for technical services under domestic law, but treaty relief under the India-US DTAA applied because the make available condition was not satisfied, so no tax was deductible and the section 40(a)(i) disallowance failed. Licensed access to website content carrying the foreign supplier&#039;s branding was characterised as royalty, so the non-deduction of tax attracted disallowance. The section 14A/Rule 8D addition was deleted for lack of objective satisfaction, CSR donations remained eligible for deduction under section 80G subject to verification, and the Tangent International issue was remanded for examination of the scope of work.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 08:07:08 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101303</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>