Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
981 to 1000 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Penalty for misreporting under section 270A requires the assessing authority to identify the precise limb in section 270A(9) and explain how the additions satisfy that clause. A mere ad hoc disallowance of labour or loading and unloading charges, or a disallowance based on alleged non-deduction of tax at source, does not by itself establish misreporting of income. The text also notes that email-only appellate notices, when the assessee had opted for another mode, do not justify an adverse inference from non-appearance. On that reasoning, the penalty was deleted.
Penalty for misreporting under section 270A requires the assessing authority to identify the precise limb in section 270A(9) and explain how the additions satisfy that clause. A mere ad hoc disallowance of labour or loading and unloading charges, or a disallowance based on alleged non-deduction of tax at source, does not by itself establish misreporting of income. The text also notes that email-only appellate notices, when the assessee had opted for another mode, do not justify an adverse inference from non-appearance. On that reasoning, the penalty was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.