<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Misreporting penalty under section 270A needs a specific statutory limb and clear linkage to the additions before it can survive.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101255</link>
    <description>Penalty for misreporting under section 270A requires the assessing authority to identify the precise limb in section 270A(9) and explain how the additions satisfy that clause. A mere ad hoc disallowance of labour or loading and unloading charges, or a disallowance based on alleged non-deduction of tax at source, does not by itself establish misreporting of income. The text also notes that email-only appellate notices, when the assessee had opted for another mode, do not justify an adverse inference from non-appearance. On that reasoning, the penalty was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 08:47:51 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 08:47:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=909319" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Misreporting penalty under section 270A needs a specific statutory limb and clear linkage to the additions before it can survive.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101255</link>
      <description>Penalty for misreporting under section 270A requires the assessing authority to identify the precise limb in section 270A(9) and explain how the additions satisfy that clause. A mere ad hoc disallowance of labour or loading and unloading charges, or a disallowance based on alleged non-deduction of tax at source, does not by itself establish misreporting of income. The text also notes that email-only appellate notices, when the assessee had opted for another mode, do not justify an adverse inference from non-appearance. On that reasoning, the penalty was deleted.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 08:47:51 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101255</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>