Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
981 to 1000 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Receipt of premium before the accident was treated as the point at which risk attached under motor insurance, even though the policy document showed a later commencement date. Because the insurer did not examine the agent said to have handled the transaction, the court drew an adverse inference against the insurer. On the evidence of the premium transfer, the court held that the insurer could not avoid liability by relying only on the later policy date and had to satisfy the award.
Receipt of premium before the accident was treated as the point at which risk attached under motor insurance, even though the policy document showed a later commencement date. Because the insurer did not examine the agent said to have handled the transaction, the court drew an adverse inference against the insurer. On the evidence of the premium transfer, the court held that the insurer could not avoid liability by relying only on the later policy date and had to satisfy the award.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.