Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Receipt of premium before the accident was treated as the point at which risk attached under motor insurance, even though the policy document showed a later commencement date. Because the insurer did not examine the agent said to have handled the transaction, the court drew an adverse inference against the insurer. On the evidence of the premium transfer, the court held that the insurer could not avoid liability by relying only on the later policy date and had to satisfy the award.
Receipt of premium before the accident was treated as the point at which risk attached under motor insurance, even though the policy document showed a later commencement date. Because the insurer did not examine the agent said to have handled the transaction, the court drew an adverse inference against the insurer. On the evidence of the premium transfer, the court held that the insurer could not avoid liability by relying only on the later policy date and had to satisfy the award.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.