Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
981 to 1000 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Subscription to and redemption of non-cumulative redeemable preference shares could not be re-characterised as an unsecured loan for transfer pricing purposes in the absence of material showing a sham or concealment of the real transaction; with only an opening balance and minor redemption, the notional interest adjustment was deleted. On advances to subsidiaries, the assessee's substantial own funds and interest-free funds exceeded the advances, so the presumption applied that the advances came from own funds rather than borrowed funds, and the interest disallowance was deleted. The Revenue's appeal was dismissed.
Subscription to and redemption of non-cumulative redeemable preference shares could not be re-characterised as an unsecured loan for transfer pricing purposes in the absence of material showing a sham or concealment of the real transaction; with only an opening balance and minor redemption, the notional interest adjustment was deleted. On advances to subsidiaries, the assessee's substantial own funds and interest-free funds exceeded the advances, so the presumption applied that the advances came from own funds rather than borrowed funds, and the interest disallowance was deleted. The Revenue's appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.