<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Preference share subscription cannot be recharacterised as loan absent sham, and own-funds presumption defeats interest disallowance</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101188</link>
    <description>Subscription to and redemption of non-cumulative redeemable preference shares could not be re-characterised as an unsecured loan for transfer pricing purposes in the absence of material showing a sham or concealment of the real transaction; with only an opening balance and minor redemption, the notional interest adjustment was deleted. On advances to subsidiaries, the assessee&#039;s substantial own funds and interest-free funds exceeded the advances, so the presumption applied that the advances came from own funds rather than borrowed funds, and the interest disallowance was deleted. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2026 09:28:31 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2026 09:28:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=909041" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Preference share subscription cannot be recharacterised as loan absent sham, and own-funds presumption defeats interest disallowance</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101188</link>
      <description>Subscription to and redemption of non-cumulative redeemable preference shares could not be re-characterised as an unsecured loan for transfer pricing purposes in the absence of material showing a sham or concealment of the real transaction; with only an opening balance and minor redemption, the notional interest adjustment was deleted. On advances to subsidiaries, the assessee&#039;s substantial own funds and interest-free funds exceeded the advances, so the presumption applied that the advances came from own funds rather than borrowed funds, and the interest disallowance was deleted. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2026 09:28:31 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101188</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>