Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Page of 4800
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
381 to 400 of 95999 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Subscription to and redemption of non-cumulative redeemable preference shares could not be re-characterised as an unsecured loan for transfer pricing purposes in the absence of material showing a sham or concealment of the real transaction; with only an opening balance and minor redemption, the notional interest adjustment was deleted. On advances to subsidiaries, the assessee's substantial own funds and interest-free funds exceeded the advances, so the presumption applied that the advances came from own funds rather than borrowed funds, and the interest disallowance was deleted. The Revenue's appeal was dismissed.
Subscription to and redemption of non-cumulative redeemable preference shares could not be re-characterised as an unsecured loan for transfer pricing purposes in the absence of material showing a sham or concealment of the real transaction; with only an opening balance and minor redemption, the notional interest adjustment was deleted. On advances to subsidiaries, the assessee's substantial own funds and interest-free funds exceeded the advances, so the presumption applied that the advances came from own funds rather than borrowed funds, and the interest disallowance was deleted. The Revenue's appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.