Transfer pricing and tax deductions upheld on established principles, while employee contributions and warranty provisions returned for fresh examinat...
Captive transfer pricing relies on industrial consumer tariffs, while genuine quotations can benchmark effluent treatment transfers under the Other Me...
Specific tariff classification for ophthalmic instruments and extended limitation principles determine the treatment of duty demands, confiscation, an...
Integrated golf function determines classification, placing launch monitors and simulators under other golf equipment rather than measuring instrument...
Public servant status under anti-corruption law extends to recognised stock exchange leadership; constitutional and sanction challenges do not succeed...
Acquiescence, homebuyer protection and clean-slate resolution principles prevent landowners from disrupting an integrated project through late termina...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1001 to 1020 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Negative due date rate in cash-settled crude oil futures was upheld because the contract specifications tied settlement to the NYMEX front-month settlement price converted into rupees, and the DDR was a reference rate applied after trading closed, not a standalone market price. The HC held that traders who chose to retain their positions until expiry could not later insist on a floor price or seek annulment of the settlement, as that would contradict the agreed contract framework and prejudice counterparties. Judicial interference was also declined because the settlement had already been completed across numerous traders and could not be effectively unwound through writ directions.
Negative due date rate in cash-settled crude oil futures was upheld because the contract specifications tied settlement to the NYMEX front-month settlement price converted into rupees, and the DDR was a reference rate applied after trading closed, not a standalone market price. The HC held that traders who chose to retain their positions until expiry could not later insist on a floor price or seek annulment of the settlement, as that would contradict the agreed contract framework and prejudice counterparties. Judicial interference was also declined because the settlement had already been completed across numerous traders and could not be effectively unwound through writ directions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.