Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
981 to 1000 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Unexplained cash deposits were sustained as additions because the assessee failed to discharge the onus of explaining their source and nature. The record showed continuing inconsistencies between the cash deposits, declared turnover, GST returns and accounting entries, and no reliable reconciliation was produced to link the deposits to alleged client reimbursements and booking advances in the travel business. In the absence of a verifiable explanation, the Tribunal found invocation of unexplained-income treatment and the consequential higher-tax regime justified, and the addition was upheld.
Unexplained cash deposits were sustained as additions because the assessee failed to discharge the onus of explaining their source and nature. The record showed continuing inconsistencies between the cash deposits, declared turnover, GST returns and accounting entries, and no reliable reconciliation was produced to link the deposits to alleged client reimbursements and booking advances in the travel business. In the absence of a verifiable explanation, the Tribunal found invocation of unexplained-income treatment and the consequential higher-tax regime justified, and the addition was upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.