<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Unexplained cash deposits: failure to reconcile travel reimbursements with records sustained addition under sections 69A and 115BBE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101102</link>
    <description>Unexplained cash deposits were sustained as additions because the assessee failed to discharge the onus of explaining their source and nature. The record showed continuing inconsistencies between the cash deposits, declared turnover, GST returns and accounting entries, and no reliable reconciliation was produced to link the deposits to alleged client reimbursements and booking advances in the travel business. In the absence of a verifiable explanation, the Tribunal found invocation of unexplained-income treatment and the consequential higher-tax regime justified, and the addition was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2026 08:27:37 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2026 08:27:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=908542" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Unexplained cash deposits: failure to reconcile travel reimbursements with records sustained addition under sections 69A and 115BBE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101102</link>
      <description>Unexplained cash deposits were sustained as additions because the assessee failed to discharge the onus of explaining their source and nature. The record showed continuing inconsistencies between the cash deposits, declared turnover, GST returns and accounting entries, and no reliable reconciliation was produced to link the deposits to alleged client reimbursements and booking advances in the travel business. In the absence of a verifiable explanation, the Tribunal found invocation of unexplained-income treatment and the consequential higher-tax regime justified, and the addition was upheld.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2026 08:27:37 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101102</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>