Pre-existing operational debt disputes require genuine evidence, while undirected running-account payments may be appropriated on a first-in-first-out...
Agency in CNG distribution makes outlet operators commission agents, rendering taxable Business Auxiliary Service rather than purchasing goods for res...
Composite inpatient healthcare supply may retain exemption despite MRP medicine billing, while separate taxable sale characterisation remains disputed...
Working-capital adjustment determines whether software-services transfer-pricing margins fall within the statutory tolerance range, eliminating any ad...
Permanent establishment deductions upheld for expatriate salaries, direct costs and trading losses, while head-office costs require fresh classificati...
Page of 4796
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
881 to 900 of 95916 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Transfer pricing adjustments for sales to an associated enterprise were found unsustainable where abnormal business conditions followed the shutdown of the assessee's main customer, because benchmarking had to reflect the extraordinary circumstances and the actual downstream use of the goods. Business expenditure was treated as deductible going concern expenditure: the outlay was incurred to keep trading operations running, and an ad hoc disallowance based on assumed future expansion was rejected. A sale of plant and machinery was held to be an itemised asset sale, not a slump sale, because values were assigned asset-wise and there was no transfer of the undertaking as a whole.
Transfer pricing adjustments for sales to an associated enterprise were found unsustainable where abnormal business conditions followed the shutdown of the assessee's main customer, because benchmarking had to reflect the extraordinary circumstances and the actual downstream use of the goods. Business expenditure was treated as deductible going concern expenditure: the outlay was incurred to keep trading operations running, and an ad hoc disallowance based on assumed future expansion was rejected. A sale of plant and machinery was held to be an itemised asset sale, not a slump sale, because values were assigned asset-wise and there was no transfer of the undertaking as a whole.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.