<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Transfer pricing in abnormal business conditions, going concern expenditure, and slump sale classification shaped tax treatment of asset sales</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101096</link>
    <description>Transfer pricing adjustments for sales to an associated enterprise were found unsustainable where abnormal business conditions followed the shutdown of the assessee&#039;s main customer, because benchmarking had to reflect the extraordinary circumstances and the actual downstream use of the goods. Business expenditure was treated as deductible going concern expenditure: the outlay was incurred to keep trading operations running, and an ad hoc disallowance based on assumed future expansion was rejected. A sale of plant and machinery was held to be an itemised asset sale, not a slump sale, because values were assigned asset-wise and there was no transfer of the undertaking as a whole.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2026 08:27:37 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2026 08:27:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=908536" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Transfer pricing in abnormal business conditions, going concern expenditure, and slump sale classification shaped tax treatment of asset sales</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101096</link>
      <description>Transfer pricing adjustments for sales to an associated enterprise were found unsustainable where abnormal business conditions followed the shutdown of the assessee&#039;s main customer, because benchmarking had to reflect the extraordinary circumstances and the actual downstream use of the goods. Business expenditure was treated as deductible going concern expenditure: the outlay was incurred to keep trading operations running, and an ad hoc disallowance based on assumed future expansion was rejected. A sale of plant and machinery was held to be an itemised asset sale, not a slump sale, because values were assigned asset-wise and there was no transfer of the undertaking as a whole.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2026 08:27:37 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=101096</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>