Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Transfer pricing adjustments for sales to an associated enterprise were found unsustainable where abnormal business conditions followed the shutdown of the assessee's main customer, because benchmarking had to reflect the extraordinary circumstances and the actual downstream use of the goods. Business expenditure was treated as deductible going concern expenditure: the outlay was incurred to keep trading operations running, and an ad hoc disallowance based on assumed future expansion was rejected. A sale of plant and machinery was held to be an itemised asset sale, not a slump sale, because values were assigned asset-wise and there was no transfer of the undertaking as a whole.
Transfer pricing adjustments for sales to an associated enterprise were found unsustainable where abnormal business conditions followed the shutdown of the assessee's main customer, because benchmarking had to reflect the extraordinary circumstances and the actual downstream use of the goods. Business expenditure was treated as deductible going concern expenditure: the outlay was incurred to keep trading operations running, and an ad hoc disallowance based on assumed future expansion was rejected. A sale of plant and machinery was held to be an itemised asset sale, not a slump sale, because values were assigned asset-wise and there was no transfer of the undertaking as a whole.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.